Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (1) TMI 1251

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ection 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 against the appellant, that has been reaffirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in his above noted Order-in-Appeal is assailed in these appeals. 2. I have heard submissions from both sides, gone through relevant judicial decisions and also perused the case record. As can be noticed the relevant period covered in the demand period is from December, 2015 to March, 2016 and during that period bagasse and pressmud which were held in the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court pronounced in the case of Union of India & Others Vs. M/s. DSCL Sugar Ltd. & Others reported in 2015 (322) ELT 769 as not manufacture items, for which Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Press Mud etc. being marketable cannot be considered as 'non-manufactured' during the course of manufacture of sugar anymore. The question of these products not having generated out of manufacture is thus ruled out. Therefore, the demand of an amount equal to 6% of the value of the manufactured exempted/non-excisable goods like bagasse, pressmud etc., under Rule 6(3)(b) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 as it stands post 01.03.2015 with the issuance of Notification No. 06/2015-CE (NT) dated 01.03.2015 by virtue of which manufactured non-excisable goods are even brought within the ambit of the said Rule 6, ibid, for the purpose of such payment of an amount as confirmed by the lower authority is just and legal and does not require any interventio....