<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s Order-in-Appeal dated 10.01.2019, emphasizing the legal interpretations and the applicability of relevant rules and judgments. The duty demand against the appellant based on the sale value of bagasse and pressmud was not upheld, highlighting the importance of considering judicial precedents and legal provisions in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 20:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s Order-in-Appeal dated 10.01.2019, emphasizing the legal interpretations and the applicability of relevant rules and judgments. The duty demand against the appellant based on the sale value of bagasse and pressmud was not upheld, highlighting the importance of considering judicial precedents and legal provisions in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>