Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2022 (5) TMI 785

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction quashing the impugned order of the 1st Respondent dated 21.1.2021 in AO No.ZH3701210D45148 for the tax period 01.07.2017 to 15.02.2020 under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and State Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 as illegal arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to do the assessment de novo by granting an opportunity to the Petitioner to submit objections, after furnishing to the Petitioner all the material, which is available with the 1th Respondent for use against the Petitioner in the proceedings and also granting an opportunity of personal hearing and pass..." 3. While W.P.No.1832 of 2022 is filed by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....can also avail personal hearing to advance his arguments, failing which it will be construed that he is not having any objections to file and further action will be initiated without further notice" 5. Pursuant to the said show cause notice, the petitioner herein submitted his explanation, which lead to passing of the order on 21.01.2021 impugned herein. 6. Sri S. Dwarakanath Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner mainly submits that the impugned proceedings came to be issued without furnishing the material relied upon by the authority concerned while directing the petitioner to pay tax of Rs.37,34,52,454/-. In other words, the learned counsel would contend that even as per Section 75(7) of the Act, the petitioner shou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he taxable person is the king pin. The scrap which was purportedly sold by him to Telangana did not reach the destined place as verified from Vempadu Toll Plaza data which is on way to Telangana where every vehicle moving out of Visakhapatnam or coming into Visakhapanam must get checked. Further even the incoming vehicles as per the documents of the perpetrators in the operations never came into State of Andhra Pradesh. Again it is evident from the records of Toll Plaza which are enclosed as Exhibit No.1. It is interesting to note that the vehicles either have not crossed the toll gate or the vehicles which have crossed have come from Telangana to Toll Plaza with a speed of modern racing car. In some occasions, the vehicle has crossed prior....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....prises, M/s.Sri Durga Enterprises, M/s.Sekhar Traders, M/s.Sridevi Enterprises, M/s.Surya Traders, M/s.Bhagavan Traders, M/s.Sri Durgadevi Traders, M/s Sri Rama Enterprises, M/s.Viswa Traders, M/s.Sri Sakti Enterprises, M/s.Bojanki Enterprises, M/s.Ranga Enterprises, M/s.Srinivasa Enterprises (Exhibit No.2) and in other cases, the registrations are lying. It is quite interesting to see that the input tax has been nullified by the sham transactions from State of Telangana back to the same taxable person. In such case no tax are infinitesimal quantum has to be paid compared to the profit made in the illegal trade. One can continue such Registrations eternally. Therefore, the claim of the taxable person that returns are being filed in all case....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erit, haud acquum fecerit" is that "he who shall decide anything without the other side having been heard, although he may have said what is right, will not have done what is right" or in other words, as is now expressed, "justice should not only be done but should manifestly be seen to be done". The notice must be precise and unambiguous. It should apprise the party determinatively of the case he has to meet. (Canara Bank v. Debasis Das MANU / SC / 0225 / 2003 : 2003) IILLJ531SC; Canara Bank v. V.K.Awasthy MANU/SC/0249/2005: (2005)IILLJ461SC). The person proceeded against must know that he is required to meet the allegations which might lead to a certain action being taken against him. (S.L.Kapoor v. Jagmohan MANU/SC0036/1980: [1981]1SCR 7....