https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422525 HC found the impugned order violated principles of natural justice because the authority relied on documents not furnished to the petitioner and failed to specify particulars of the allegations. The court held that the petitioner must be informed of the material relied upon and afforded an opportunity to controvert or comment on the evidence. The matter was remanded to the respondent authority to rehear the case afresh after supplying the relied-upon material and granting a personal hearing; petition allowed by way of remand. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Sep 2025 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422525 HC found the impugned order violated principles of natural justice because the authority relied on documents not furnished to the petitioner and failed to specify particulars of the allegations. The court held that the petitioner must be informed of the material relied upon and afforded an opportunity to controvert or comment on the evidence. The matter was remanded to the respondent authority to rehear the case afresh after supplying the relied-upon material and granting a personal hearing; petition allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws GST Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422525