AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (4) TMI 138
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... days. (ii) The respondent No.2 thereafter in exercise of its power under Section 5 (5) of the PML Act, 2002 filed a complaint being OC No.1382/2021 before the adjudicating authority on 24.12.2020. (iii) The respondent No.3 - Adjudicating Authority after hearing the affected parties, confirmed the order of provisional attachment and held that the properties provisionally attached by the respondent No.2 are "proceeds of crime" in terms of Section 2(1)(u) of the PML Act, 2002. (iv) Necessary facts giving rise to initiation of the proceedings under the PML Act, 2002, are as under: (a) The petitioner No.1 Hemanshu Shah was the partner of M/s. Shah Maganlal Gulabchand Choksi. The partnership firm working as a bullion traders. Income Tax Department, Gandhidham, received information with regard to high value deposits of old currency notes in the bank accounts of M/s. S.N.Traders and M/s.Nirav & Co. The information transmitted to the Surat Income Tax Office and accordingly, during the course of search proceedings in the premises of petitioners and their related firms, it was noticed that Rs. 36.17 crore during the period from 10.11.2016 to 05.12.2016 was....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ird share to his two brothers and the same was sold by way of registered sale deed dated 04.11.2020. The respondent authority directed the Surat People's Coop. Bank not to release the proportionate amount related to Hemanshu Shah and accordingly, bank vide their letter dated 16.12.2020 informed that, the amount of Rs. 18 lacs being one-third sale proceeds recovered against the mortgaged and being the share of Hemanshu Shah being invested in the FDR in the name of M/s. Maganlal Gulabchand Choksi. (g) In the aforesaid facts, on the basis of material placed before respondent No.2, the authority came to a conclusion that, the petitioner No.1 with criminal intent, connived with others utilized the bank account for depositing demonetized SBNs to the extent of Rs. 36.17 crore and channelized the unaccounted black money to the banking system, which is nothing, but proceeds of crime as Rs. 34.82 crore has been transferred to the bank account of M/s. Shah Maganlal G. Choksi and therefore, there is reasonable ground to believe that, properties mentioned in the Schedule are liable for provisional attachment under Section 5 of the PML Act being value of the property derived or obta....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....K. Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Devang Vyas, learned Additional Solicitor General of India for the respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that; (i) The properties in question were acquired much prior to the alleged act of offences under the PML Act, 2002 and therefore, they do not come within the definition of "proceed of crime". In this context, he urged that, the residential flat and shop admittedly purchased prior to the enactment of the PML Act, 2002. Thus, therefore, it is evident that, the properties were not purchased from the criminal activity, which can be established from the details of the purchase of properties collected during the investigation. In that view of the matter, the entire exercise of the respondent authorities suffer from arbitrariness, against the mandate of law and as such is violative of legal right of the petitioners and therefore, the authority erred in holding the value of any proceeds of crime is covered under the definition of proceed of crime and wrongly held that, the properties in question are value of properties derived or obtained by criminal activity. The impugned order passed under Sect....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eds of crime are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealt with in any manner, which may result in frustrating proceedings relating to confiscation of such proceeds of crime. In this context, it was submitted that, the respondent No.2 while passing the order had considered the nature of properties, conduct of the petitioners and object of the legislature. Drawing the attention to pages 23 to 34 and 37 to 39 of the provisional attachment order, it was contended that, the respondent No.2 had considered material collected during the course of investigation come to the conclusion that, the properties are likely to be transferred or dealt with in such a manner, which may result in frustrating further proceedings of confiscation. It was further submitted that the share of petitioner No.1 in residential property has been sold to petitioner No.2 after registration of the offence. Petitioner No.1 has sold his one-third share of one another residential property to his two brothers and later on, both the brothers have sold the property, which was placed under the collateral security with Surat People's Coop. Bank. (iii) It was submitted that, the properties are liable to attac....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gued that, the petitioners herein have not brought on record the relevant material to show that the Appellate Authorities to adjudicate the matter were not available. The petitioners could have produced the memo of appeal or acknowledgment of the office of the Appellate Tribunal to show that, they had genuinely preferred appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. Therefore, merely raising the contentions in the petition is not suffice to hold that, at the relevant point of time, the posts were vacant. Learned ASG Mr. Vyas raised the technical issue that, the writ petition in the present form is not maintainable as the attachment proceedings is civil in nature and therefore, the writ petition invoking criminal jurisdiction, seeking writ of certiorari is not maintainable and therefore, on this count only, the petition deserves to be dismissed. In view of the aforesaid contentions, learned ASG submitted that the authorities have followed the mandatory provisions of the PML Act, 2002 and rules thereunder and therefore, the petitioners failed to make out a case for exercising extraordinary power and the petition devoid of any merits, deserves to be dismissed. 7. Before dealing with the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s to be exercised if the authority has reason to believe, on the basis of material in their possession that, any person is in possession of any proceeds of crime and such proceed of crime are likely to be concealed, transferred, or dealt with in any manner, which may result in frustrating any proceedings relating to confiscation of such proceeds of crime. If the conditions as laid down are satisfied, the authority may by order in writing provisionally attach property. It is settled law that, the authority may proceed with the provisional attachment even their being no prosecution qua schedule offence against the persons. It is statutory duty on the part of the authority to file a complaint, stating the facts of attachment before the adjudicating authority after provisional attachment. Section 24 of the PML Act, 2002, casts the burden of proving that, the alleged proceeds of crime are not involved in money laundering on the accused. 12. In the case of Satyam Computer Services Ltd. Vs. Director of Enforcement & Ors., vide judgment dated 31.12.2018, (Manu/HY/0428/2018), Hyderabad High Court held that, in a case when the proceeds of crime are untraceable, or have been disposed of in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h "value of any such property" occurring in the definition of "proceeds of crime" includes any property of any person irrespective of source of the property. The Division Bench, after considering the judgments of Satyam Computer (supra) and Abdul Ali Balsharaf (supra) held that, the properties purchased prior to the commission of the offence would not fall within the meaning of proceeds of crime. The Division bench also held that there are three limbs of Section 2(1)(u) of the PML Act, 2002 viz. (i) any property derived or obtained directly or indirectly as a result of criminal activity relating to Scheduled offence (ii) value of property derived or obtained from criminal activity and (iii) property equivalent in value held in India or outside where property obtained or derived from criminal activity is taken or held outside the country. The Division Bench further held that the property purchased or acquired before the commission of the offence, would not fall within the first limb of definition of proceeds of crime, however, in cases where the proceeds of crime are held abroad, any property of the accused irrespective of its date of acquisition, can be attached. Findings :- ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....35 of the judgment of Division Bench of Punjab & Haryana High Court, in the case Seema Garg (supra) are relevant to refer, which reads as under:- "31. Property purchased prior to commission of scheduled offence leaving aside date of enactment of PMLA, does not fall within ambit of first limb of definition of 'proceeds of crime', however it certainly falls within purview and ambit of third limb of the definition. Counsel for both sides have cited judgment of Delhi High Court in the case of Abdullah Ali 22 of 38 PMLA No.1 of 2019(O&M) #23# Balsharaf & Another Vs Directorate of Enforcement and Others 2019 (3) RCR (Criminal) 798 to support their contention. As per said judgment, if property derived or obtained from scheduled offence is taken or held outside India, the property of equivalent value held in India or abroad may be attached irrespective of date of purchase. We fully subscribe to the opinion expressed by Delhi High Court. We find that third limb of definition 'proceeds of crime' covers property equivalent to property held or taken outside India, thus date of purchase of property which is equivalent to property held outside India, is irrelevant. Any p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ead as a whole/ in its entirety and every provision should be read in such a manner that it makes other provisions and scheme of Act coherent and meaningful. A provision cannot be read in isolation. The definition part does not create rights and liabilities, thus it should be examined in the light of other sections which create rights and liabilities. As per Section 8(1) of the PMLA, the Adjudicating Authority has to serve notice calling upon the person to indicate the source of his income, earning or assets out of which or by means of which he has acquired the property attached under Section 5 of the PMLA. Seeking explanation about source of property and furnishing explanation is meaningless if property inspite of genuine and explained source may be attached. As per Section 24 of the PMLA, burden to prove 24 of 38 PMLA No.1 of 2019(O&M) #25# that property is not involved in money laundering is upon the person whose property is attached. There is no sense on the part of any person to discharge burden qua source of property if any property may be attached, irrespective of its source. 33. As per Section 8(6) of the PMLA, where the Special Court finds that offence of money la....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n and include any property which has no link direct or indirect with the property derived or obtained from commission of scheduled offence i.e. the alleged criminal activity. 'Value of such property' means property which has been converted into another property or has been obtained on the basis of property derived from commission of scheduled offence e.g. cash is received as bribe and invested in purchase of some house. House is value of property derived from scheduled offence. Cash in the hands of an accused of offence under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is property directly derived from scheduled offence, however if some movable or immovable property is purchased against said cash, the movable or immovable property would be 'value of property' derived from commission of scheduled offence. If a person gets some land or building by committing cheating (Section 420 of IPC) which is a scheduled offence and said building or land is sold prior to registration of FIR or ECIR, the property derived from scheduled offence 26 of 38 PMLA No.1 of 2019(O&M) #27# would not be available, however money generated from sale or transfer of said property in the form of cash or an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aterial before the ITO and formation of his believed that income had escaped assessment. In the facts of the present case, while forming the belief, the officer had no sufficient material to determine whether the properties were obtained from criminal activity. The concerned officer had mechanically taking wordings of Section 5(1) of the Act, formed his belief and came to the conclusion that, the value of the properties derived or obtained by criminal activity. Even the Adjudicating Authority while confirming the provisional attachment order had not applied his mind with respect to the properties. 23. The learned ASG Mr. Vyas referring to Section 24 of the PML Act, submitted that, Section 24 provides to raise presumption with respect to proceeds of crime involved in money laundering and therefore, at the stage of passing the provisional attachment order or while confirming it by the authority, it is not necessary to assess or weigh the full evidence as required at the stage of final decision. This Court is disagree with the contention raised on behalf of the respondent authority. Section 24 of the Act cannot be read, as as to obviate the requirement for the respondent authority ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the PML Act, 2002, however, it was learnt that, the authorities to adjudicate the appeals were not available and no new appointment was being given by the government and therefore, the petitioners have no efficacious remedy available except to file present petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India. He also pointed out that, the writ jurisdiction of the High Court is not excluded by statute and more particularly when the respondent authorities have acted contrary to the mandatory provisions of the Act, present writ petition on technical ground of availability of alternative remedy cannot be dismissed. 27. By enacting Section 25 of the PML Act, 2002, the central government has established an Appellate Tribunal to hear appeal against the orders of the Appellate Authority and authorities under the Act, whereas, Section 26 says that, the authority or any person aggrieved by an order made by the Adjudicating Authority under the Act may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. 28. It is settled by catena of decisions of the Apex Court that, jurisdiction of High Court is to issue a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indian is pleanary in nature and is not ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....diction of the Court, is not maintainable. In the reply of the said contention, learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. Mehta referring to Section 46 of the PML Act, 2002, submitted that, the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure is applicable to the proceedings before the Special Court and therefore, petition in present form registered as Special Criminal Application is maintainable. It is to be noted that, Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not make any classification as to the nature of proceedings and if the condition for granting relief to a person is satisfied in a particular case, then the relief has to be granted irrespective of nature of the proceedings. It is true that, the proceedings of the provisional attachment is civil in nature. The Special Court has power to pass an order of confiscation of the property, as provided under sub-section (5) of Section 8 of the PML Act. It provides that, on conclusion of a trial of an offence, the Special Court finds that, the offence of money laundering has been committed, it shall order that such property involved in money laundering or used for commission of the offence of money laundering, shall stand confiscated to t....