<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 138 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420472</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the provisional attachment order and subsequent proceedings under the PML Act. It directed the authorities to release the attached properties, emphasizing that the properties acquired before the offense cannot be considered &quot;proceeds of crime.&quot; The court held that the burden of proof was not discharged by the authorities and that the writ petition was maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:13:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 138 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420472</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the provisional attachment order and subsequent proceedings under the PML Act. It directed the authorities to release the attached properties, emphasizing that the properties acquired before the offense cannot be considered &quot;proceeds of crime.&quot; The court held that the burden of proof was not discharged by the authorities and that the writ petition was maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>