Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (10) TMI 763

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sive findings given by the Joint Parliamentary Committee regarding an incident which took place on the Floor of the House on 22.07.2008 during the vote of confidence motion, whereby three BJP MPs had shown wads of currency notes during session in the parliament house, amounting to Rs. 1 crore. 4. The investigating authority filed charge-sheet followed by supplementary charge-sheet and the petitioner was directed to appear on 06.09.2011 before the Ld. Special Judge. 5. Further submitted that in spite of the bad health of the petitioner, he appeared on the said date, thereafter he was ordered to be sent in judicial custody. 6. Thereafter, the health of the petitioner started deteriorating day by day and finally on 12.09.2011 the petitioner was referred by the Board of Doctors to AIIMS and since then he is in the hospital. 7. Ld. Senior Counsel has drawn the attention of this Court towards the medical report dated 11.10.2011 of Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Addl. Professor, Deptt. Of Nephrology, AIIMS which is reproduced as under: Comprehensive Medical Report of Shri Amar Singh, Hon'ble MP, Rajya Sabha On 12th September, 2011 Sh. Amar Singh, 55/M, was referred by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the dose of immunosuppressive drug (Tacrolimus) has made him more prone to infections but same is required to prevent allograft rejection. The repeat tacrolimus drug level came as 7.2ng/ml i.e. within the limits required for the transplanted kidney. With increase in Tacrolimus dose his blood sugars are fluctuating and with the advice of endocrinologist, the blood sugars are now being controlled by adding insulin. US abdomen showed mild hydronephrosis of allograft and grade 1 prostatomegaly with insignificant post void residue i.e within normal range. The thyroid function test is within normal limits. Lipid profile is also within normal limits. On 24th September he underwent nerve conduction studies for assessment of peripheral neuropathy. That was consistent with small fiber neuropathy. He was also investigated for atherosclerotic vascular disease by Doppler US that suggested partially occluded peripheral artery disease. Echocardiography reveals EF 60% mild left ventricular hypertrophy. Stool culture did not grow any pathogenic bacteria. Prostatic specific antigen was 1.02ngm/ml within normal limits. Cytomegalovirus PCR was <600 copies / ml (within normal limits). For diarrhea I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....son accused of, or suspected of, the commission of any non-bailabdle offence is arrested or detained without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station or appears or is brought before a Court other than the High Court or Court of Session, he may be released on bail, but- (i).... (ii).... Provided that the Court may direct that a person referred to in clause (i) or clause (ii) be released on bail if such person is under the age of sixteen years or is a woman or is sick or infirm: 9. Vide order dated 13.09.2009, interim bail was granted to the petitioner/accused on medical grounds. Thereafter, vide order dated 28.09.2011, the ld. Special Judge declined to grant regular bail to the petitioner keeping in view the report dated 26.09.2011 as the condition of the petitioner was shown stable but it require monitoring. 10. Further it was submitted that the ld. Special Judge did not go through the said report wherein it was clearly mentioned that "for his anxiety and restlessness a psychiatry consultation has also been sought. On 13th September night he developed severe abdominal pain which got relieved by medicine given by gastroenterologist and he ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve him examined by various super specialists in view of the medical history of renal transplantation, intestinal resection, Diabetes Mellitus, hypertension etc. It is reiterated that so far he has been shown to the following doctors: 1. D. R.S. Ahlawat, Professor of Medicine and Nephrology, LNJP Hospital. 2. Dr. Sanjay Schdeva, Associate Professor, Gastroenterology, G.B. Pant Hospital. 3. Dr. Neera Chaudhary, Associate Professor, Neurology, G.B. Pant Hospital. 4. Dr. Anuj Mittal, Psychiatrist, Central Jail Tihar. 5. Dr. Jwala Prasad, Senior Resident, Central Jail Tihar. 13. Accordingly, the interim bail was granted to the petitioner. 14. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the doctor at Singapore had written a letter to the petitioner on 18.09.2009 which is a page 228 of the paper book wherein it is mentioned as under: Mr. Amar Singh is a 53 year old man who had undergone an uncomplicated living donor kidney transplant on July 1th 2009. The aetiology of his end stage kidney disease is uncertain and is likely to be multi-factorial related to hypertension and possibly renal oxalosis. His past history was significant for extensive small bo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r submitted that the charge-sheet filed against the petitioner is under section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and if convicted 5 years would be maximum punishment. 19. The allegations against the petitioner are as under: During scrutiny of bank details it is found that there is an entry of deposit of Rs.One Crore in this account on 22.07.08. On further analysis it is found that there is a pattern of deposit of one crore amounts of cash in this account on many occasions which is regularly being spent by issue of various cheques. However, during investigation no further evidence could be found to connect Sh. Shyam Jaju with Sanjeev Saxena and further no evidence was found regarding delivery of bribe money by Shyam Jaju to Sanjeev Saxena on 22.07.2008 During investigation details of bank accounts were obtained from Sh.Amar Singh and details of account of the same from 1.7.2008 to 30.7.2008 were obtained from concerned banks. The details of the Bank Accounts are as under: (i) A/C No. 001790700000154 of YES Bank. (ii) A/C Nos. 814338 and 814356 of the Royal Bank of Scotland. (iii) A/C No. 10023....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (xii) The Committee are constrained to observe that the material on record does not conclusively prove that the money contained in the bag, which was eventually displayed in the House, was actually sent by Shri Amar Singh for the purpose of winning over Shri Ashok Argal, Shri Gaggan Singh Kulaste, and Shri Mahavir Bhagora, to vote in favour of Motion of Confidence. (xiii) As there is no case against Shri Ahmad Patel and there is no clinching evidence against Shri Amar Singh, there is no occasion for the Committee or the House to make a request to Rajya Sabha requiring the said two members to appear before the Inquiry Committee for evidence. There is also no occasion for referring the matter relating to complaint against the said two members to Rajya Sabha for examination, investigation and report. 23. In the conclusion of the Parliamentary committee it is stated as under: IX. Recommendations 168. The Committee after taking into account their findings and conclusions in the matter [as detailed in para 141 particularly at (xiv) to (xvii) relating to the roles of Shri Sanjeev Saxena, Shri Suhail Hindustani and Shri Sudheendra Kulkarni], recommended that thi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... been rejected. It was also the contention of the learned Senior Counsel that the observation in the order passed by the High Court that short-term bail was granted to the respondent with a view to keep a watch over his future conduct and activities during the period is wholly unsustainable in law. 5.... 6. We have considered the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties. The observations in the order of the High Court that the applicant is allowed short-term bail also "with a view to keep a watch over his future conduct and activities during this period" does not commend to us. If a case for release of the applicant on bail is not otherwise made out, he cannot be released on bail for a limited period, only for keeping watch over his future conduct and activities during the period. That part of the order of the High Court is clearly unsustainable. However, the High Court, as noted earlier, granted bail to the respondent on medical grounds. It is not disputed before us that the respondent is suffering from certain kidney ailments for which he requires frequent medical attention. There is no allegation that during the period he has been on bail the respo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the prior permission of the magistrate and shall report to the Investigating Officer of the different cases as and when called upon to do so. Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 4581/2006 is accordingly allowed and the order of the Bombay High Court dated 14th July, 2006 refusing the petitioner&#39;s prayer for grant of bail is set aside. 28. Further submitted that as observed in the case of Lalit Somdatta Nagpal and another(supra), on consideration of the medical condition of the petitioner permitted him to be treated in a private hospital though he was arrested under the provisions of MCOCA, 1999. 29. Ld. Senior counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that he is not arguing on the merit of the case at this stage though nothing substantial has been found against the petitioner, however, he is limiting his argument for bail considering the medical condition of the petitioner. 30. Further submitted, if ld. counsel for respondent is able to cross the first hurdle, i.e., the ground taken on medical condition, then he reserve his right to argue on merit. 31. On the other hand Mr. Mohan Parasaran, learned ASG has submitted that no doubt the condition of the petitio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....highly sanitized environment. He should avoid crowded places, un-sanitized environment to prevent getting infected. Unhygienic environment may lead to repeated infections leading to sepsis. The people around him should have not any communicable disease. The food for him should be proper hygienic and free from any microbes. Drinking water should similarly be free of microbes. He needs to have small frequent meals that are required due to diabetes and short gut syndrome. He needs take medicines and follow a routine as directed to prevent any transplant kidney function deterioration. He needs to be constantly monitored for renal function, infections and if he is travelling he should be under supervision of a nephrologist, a dialysis technician, a nurse and should use ambulances / air ambulance for any emergency. 35. Keeping the medical reports of the petitioner into view, it seems to me that the health condition of the petitioner is very critical. Even the doctor had advised him not to go in a crowded area and remain in a very hygienic condition to avoid infection. Obviously, the jail is not such a place where the condition as required could be made available. 36. Keeping in ....