<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 763 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300945</link>
    <description>Bail on medical grounds was justified where the accused was a renal transplant patient with multiple serious ailments, recurrent infections, unstable renal parameters, diabetes and other complications requiring constant specialist monitoring. The Court found that a clean, highly sanitised environment and ongoing treatment could not be adequately ensured in custody, and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The prosecution&#039;s concerns about possible evidence tampering or witness influence were held capable of being met through protective bail conditions. On that humanitarian basis, the petition was allowed and release on bail was directed subject to safeguards including travel restrictions, passport deposit, and non-interference with witnesses or evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 763 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300945</link>
      <description>Bail on medical grounds was justified where the accused was a renal transplant patient with multiple serious ailments, recurrent infections, unstable renal parameters, diabetes and other complications requiring constant specialist monitoring. The Court found that a clean, highly sanitised environment and ongoing treatment could not be adequately ensured in custody, and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The prosecution&#039;s concerns about possible evidence tampering or witness influence were held capable of being met through protective bail conditions. On that humanitarian basis, the petition was allowed and release on bail was directed subject to safeguards including travel restrictions, passport deposit, and non-interference with witnesses or evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>