2022 (2) TMI 657
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....;ble Mr. Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari For the Petitioner : Mr. G. Narendra Chetty, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Y. N. Vivekananda, Government Pleader, Commercial Tax ORAL JUDGMENT (PER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH) Heard Mr. G. Narendra Chetty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Y. N. Vivekananda, learned Government Pleader, Commercial Tax, for the respond....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rs as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice." 3. The contention of the petitioner is that the vehicle and the scrap materials loaded on it were illegally detained and kept in the custody of the authorities despite having all the legal documents for such transportation. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on 30.12.2021 e....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s have been advanced inasmuch as there was no occasion for the authorities to misbehave with the son of the proprietor of the petitioner firm as everything was on record. It was submitted that the factual position is that despite the petitioner having e-way bill and tax invoice, the same were in relation to only 8695 Kgs of the iron and steel scrap, whereas upon actual verification, by getting the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....astened on the basis of the same. 7. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that, in any view of the matter, since even basic facts are in dispute, this Court may not interfere in the matter and the petitioner should be relegated to the statutory authority/forum where these matters can be well thrashed out. 8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of....
TaxTMI