Detained MS Iron Goods to be Re-weighed in Owner's Presence Following Dispute Over 1025 Kg Excess Under Section 130(1) of APGST Act

The HC ordered a fresh weighing of detained MS Iron goods (8695 Kgs) and vehicle in the petitioner's representative's presence after considering competing claims. Petitioner argued detention was arbitrary despite having valid Tax Invoice and E-Way Bill, with no proper notice served. Authorities claimed there was an excess of 1025 Kgs compared to declared weight and issued a show-cause notice under Section 130(1) of APGST Act. The Court disposed of the writ petition without costs, directing the petitioner's representative to appear for the weighing process, with further legal consequences to follow based on results.

---

---

Issues involved:
Petitioner seeking release of goods detained by authorities despite having legal documents.

Analysis:
The petitioner moved the Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus to challenge the detention of goods (8695 Kgs of MS Iron) and a vehicle by the First Respondent since 30-12-2021. The petitioner argued that despite having a Tax Invoice and E-Way Bill, the detention was arbitrary and without legal basis. The petitioner contended that the authorities stopped the vehicle after the e-way bill was generated and failed to provide any reasons for detention.

The petitioner's counsel highlighted that no notice was served on the petitioner's representative, and the authorities proceeded against the goods without legal authority. The petitioner's son visited the authorities but faced rude behavior. On the other hand, the respondents argued that there was an excess of 1025 Kgs in the actual weight of the iron and steel scrap compared to what was declared in the tax invoice and e-way bill. They issued a show-cause notice for confiscation under Section 130(1) of the APGST Act.

The petitioner's counsel objected to the weighing report being obtained without their knowledge, arguing that liability cannot be established based on this report. The respondents contended that due to the factual disputes, the Court should not interfere, and the petitioner should address the matter through the statutory authority/forum.

Considering the circumstances, the Court ordered a fresh weighing of the vehicle and materials in the presence of the petitioner's authorized representative. The Court directed the representative to appear before the authorities on a specified date for the weighing process. Depending on the outcome, further legal consequences would follow. The Court disposed of the writ petition without any costs, clarifying that the decision was based on the specific case facts and did not express an opinion on the case's merits. Any pending miscellaneous petitions were also disposed of accordingly.

---