TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (2) TMI 125
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....N AMANULLAH AND HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE B. S. BHANUMATHI Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. P. Girish Kumar, Advocate Counsel for the respondents : Mr. Y. N. Vivekananda, Govt. Pleader, Commercial Tax ORAL JUDGMENT Heard Mr. P. Girish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Y. N. Vivekananda, learned Government Pleader, Commercial Tax, for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has moved ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....omment on such factual aspects which it does not propose to. 5. Similarly, various factual aspects brought to the notice of the Court by learned counsel for the respondents are also not being taken note of. However, it is recorded that learned counsel for the respondents has taken a preliminary objection that the matter can be taken in appeal before the appellate authority and further that the or....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nst the order impugned. Since the limitation for filing such appeal has expired, but in view of the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court extending the limitation period in such matters, the period for filing the appeal still survives. No order as to costs. 7. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has filed an Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2021 for suspen....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....missioner (ST), Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada to take appropriate disciplinary action against one of the proposed respondents for fabricating the summons dated 07.11.2019 and pressing into service the FORM GST INS-01 issued in favour of some other officer. 8. Having considered the aforesaid submission, the Court does not find any occasion to allow these Interlocutory Applications as no purpose would....