https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417874 HC disposed of a writ petition challenging tax imposition under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court determined that since the disputed issues were primarily factual in nature requiring verification of records and evidence, Article 226 jurisdiction was not the appropriate forum. Noting that the impugned order was appealable, the Court directed the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority within three weeks. The Court declined to grant interlocutory applications for suspension of the order and other reliefs, making no comment on the merits of the case. en-us Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417874 HC disposed of a writ petition challenging tax imposition under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court determined that since the disputed issues were primarily factual in nature requiring verification of records and evidence, Article 226 jurisdiction was not the appropriate forum. Noting that the impugned order was appealable, the Court directed the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority within three weeks. The Court declined to grant interlocutory applications for suspension of the order and other reliefs, making no comment on the merits of the case. Case-Laws GST Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417874