1936 (8) TMI 5

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at view is contrary to Peri Ramasami v. Chandra Kottayya 1925 47 MLJ 840. Nor do I agree with the Munsif that an acknowledgment of the correctness of an account requires a stamp to be valid. It depends on whether the acknowledgment is one within the Stamp Act; and I think the reasons given in Nagappa Chetty v. V.A.A.R. Firm AIR 1925 Mad 1215, that an acknowledgment which is merely intended to ackn....