TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Legal Ruling: Acknowledgment under Limitation Act doesn't need promise to pay</h1> <h3>Magham Chinna Subbaroyudu and Ors. Versus Vangala Narasimha Reddi and Ors.</h3> The High Court of Madras held that an acknowledgment under Section 19 of the Limitation Act does not require a promise to pay. An acknowledgment of the ... - The High Court of Madras held that an acknowledgment under Section 19 of the Limitation Act does not require a promise to pay. An acknowledgment of the correctness of an account does not need a stamp unless required by the Stamp Act. The court dismissed the civil revision petition as there was no evidence to show that defendant 2 was authorized to acknowledge defendant 1's liability. (Case citation: 1936 (8) TMI 5 - MADRAS HIGH COURT)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
