Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (1) TMI 981

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nds inter alia that :- "1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the penalty levied on derivative loss though it is a speculative loss, holding that the genuineness of this loss is not in dispute. 2. The CIT (A) has erred in deleting the penalty ignoring the fact that the speculative loss was due to 'trading in derivatives' and wrong claim of it as 'business loss' cannot be bonafide because its main business is sugar export & the claim cannot be because of oversight but is an act of commission." 2. Briefly stated the facts necessary for adjudication of the controversy at hand are : On the basis of assessment framed under section 143 (3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat in order to initiate the penalty proceedings, the AO has failed to specify in the show-cause notice issued u/s 271(1)(c)/274 of the Act if the assessee has concealed the particulars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income and relied upon the decisions of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. SSA's Emerald Meadows -73 taxmann.com 241 (Kar.) (Revenue's SLP dismissed in 242 taxman 180) and Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Pr. CIT vs. Sahara India Life Insurance Company Ltd. in ITA 475/2019 order dated 02.08.2019. Ld. AR for the assessee further contended that when there is returned income/assessed income under MAT then no penalty is leviable for additions/disallowances made under the normal provisions and relied upon th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... August Kranti Marg, New Delhi - 49. Whereas in the course of proceedings before me for the assessment year 2010-11 it appears to me that you:- * Have without reasonable cause failed to comply with a notice under section 142(1)/143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated......... * Have concealed the particulars of your income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income in terms of explanation 1, 2,3,4 and 5. You are hereby requested to appear before me at 11.30 AM/PM on 23.02.2013 and show cause why an order imposing a penalty on you should not be made under section 271 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. If you do not wish to avail yourself of this opportunity of being heard in person or throug....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....otton & Ginning Factory [2013] 359 1TR 565/218 Taxman 423/35 taxmann.com 250, allowed appeal of assessee holding that notice issued by Assessing Officer under section 274 read with section 271 (1 )(c) was bad in law, as it did not specify under which limb of section 271 (1 )(c) penalty proceedings had been initiated, i.e., whether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - High Court held that matter was covered by aforesaid decision of Division Bench and, therefore, there was no substantial question of law arising for determination - Whether since there was no merit in SLP filed by revenue, same was liable to be dismissed - Held, yes [Para 2] [In favour of assessee]" 12. Hon'ble Delhi Hi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssed income is made under MAT provisions and thereby made certain additions under normal provisions of the Act, penalty cannot be imposed on the basis of disallowances or additions as has been held by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs. Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd. (supra) by returning following findings :- "Under the scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the total income of the assessee is first computed under the normal provisions of the Act and tax payable on such total income is compared with the prescribed percentage of the book profits computed under section 115JB of the Act. The higher of the two amounts is regarded as total income and tax is payable with reference to such total income. If the tax payable under the norm....