<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 981 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty on derivative loss claimed as a business loss. It emphasized the necessity of specific charges in penalty notices and clarified that penalties cannot be imposed solely based on additions under normal provisions when income is assessed under MAT provisions. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of each issue raised, citing legal precedents and relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 981 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty on derivative loss claimed as a business loss. It emphasized the necessity of specific charges in penalty notices and clarified that penalties cannot be imposed solely based on additions under normal provisions when income is assessed under MAT provisions. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of each issue raised, citing legal precedents and relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>