Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1983 (12) TMI 45

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The question of law that has been referred is as follows: "Whether, on the facts and in law in the circumstances of the case, and on a proper interpretation of Explanation 1 of rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the Tribunal was right in holding that the said sum of Rs. 3,50,000 being the adjustment made in respect of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessee's own case on November 7, 1978, for the previous assessment year, the question is answered in the affirmative and against the assessee. Mr. Bajoria, appearing on behalf of the assessee, has contended that there is another decision of this court in the case of CIT v. Indian Leaf Tobacco Development Co. Ltd. [1981] 132 ITR 831, in which a seemingly contradictory view has been taken. In....