<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 45 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27547</link>
    <description>An amount adjusted for excess depreciation charged in earlier years cannot be treated as part of capital for computing the statutory deduction under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The Calcutta HC followed its earlier Division Bench ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case, found no reason to depart from it, and held that a later decision cited by the assessee did not displace that precedent. The excess depreciation adjustment was therefore excluded from capital for surtax computation, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:20:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 45 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27547</link>
      <description>An amount adjusted for excess depreciation charged in earlier years cannot be treated as part of capital for computing the statutory deduction under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The Calcutta HC followed its earlier Division Bench ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case, found no reason to depart from it, and held that a later decision cited by the assessee did not displace that precedent. The excess depreciation adjustment was therefore excluded from capital for surtax computation, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>