Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1981 (10) TMI 3

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rence made under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, referring for our answer the following questions of law: " (1) Whether the order of the Tribunal that the penalty order was not passed beyond the prescribed period of limitation was correct in law ? (2) Whether the order of the Tribunal that reasonable opportunity had been provided to the assessee of being heard against the propose....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on except in those cases where, by expiry of limitation, a vested right has arisen in favour of the assessee. In the instant case, the limitation for imposition of penalty did not start to run at all before s. 275 was amended by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970. In the circumstances, there is no question whatsoever of application s. 275 as it stood before the amendment. The Tribunal, in our....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nalty was passed on April 30, 1975. The assessee argued before the Tribunal that he had been taken suddenly ill two days prior to the date of hearing and, therefore, he could not appear before the IAC on the date of hearing and that, therefore, there was no reasonable opportunity to him to meet the proposed penalty. It is clear from the facts that the assessee had the opportunity of filing his exp....