1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Madhya Pradesh HC upholds Income-tax penalty order, assessee to bear costs.</h1> The HC of Madhya Pradesh upheld the penalty order under the Income-tax Act, stating it was within the limitation period. The assessee was deemed to have ... Penalty The High Court of Madhya Pradesh held that the penalty order was passed within the prescribed period of limitation under section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court also ruled that the assessee was provided with a reasonable opportunity to be heard against the proposed penalty. The Tribunal's decisions on both issues were upheld, and the assessee was ordered to pay the costs of the reference to the Department.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
