2021 (11) TMI 162

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by the petitioner against the judgment dated 14.07.2008 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Porahat at Chaibasa in Complaint Case No.17/07 (T.R. No.355 of 2008) for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, was dismissed. The petitioner was sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 3 months and was directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,60,425/- in three equal monthly installments. The instalment was also fixed by the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate and there was a default clause in connection with payment of compensation for simple imprisonment of further one month. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the impugned order has submitted that the only....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....3, the complainant, has categorically stated in his evidence that he had advanced a loan of Rs. 1,60,425/- to the petitioner. On 10.10.2006, a sum of Rs. 20,000/-; on 19.10.06, a sum of Rs. 1,10,000/- and on 07.11.2006, an amount of Rs. 30,000/- was received by the petitioner and she had promised to return the same within one month, but she failed to refund the amount within one month. Thereafter, she issued the aforesaid cheque of Rs. 1,60,425/- in his favour. This witness has also stated that on 07.06.2007, said cheque was presented by him for encashment which was dishonored with a return memo indicating "insufficient fund". Thereafter, a legal notice was sent to the accused demanding the amount. The accused received the legal notice and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar as the appellate court is concerned, the appellate court also considered the evidence on record and recorded its finding at para 13 of the impugned judgment which reads as follows: "13. After having heard the learned counsels for both the sides and upon going through the record, I find that in the Court below, the complainant has been able to prove the case beyond all reasonable doubts that the cheque was issued by the accused in his favour, which has been marked Exhibit - 1, which was issued in discharge of the loan taken by the accused/appellant from the complainant. The required notice was also issued in favour of the complainant, which has been proved as Exhibit - 2 and the acknowledgement of the notice has also been marked Exhibit....