<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 162 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414381</link>
    <description>The criminal revision challenging the judgment of the Sessions Judge, where the petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for bouncing a cheque of Rs. 1,60,425, was dismissed. Both the trial court and the appellate court found that the elements of the offence were satisfied, and the evidence, including cheque issuance and witness testimonies, supported the conviction. The courts upheld the conviction, emphasizing the established debt through various pieces of evidence. The petitioner&#039;s argument regarding the debt not being proved was deemed lacking merit, leading to the dismissal of the revision and cancellation of the bail bond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 162 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414381</link>
      <description>The criminal revision challenging the judgment of the Sessions Judge, where the petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for bouncing a cheque of Rs. 1,60,425, was dismissed. Both the trial court and the appellate court found that the elements of the offence were satisfied, and the evidence, including cheque issuance and witness testimonies, supported the conviction. The courts upheld the conviction, emphasizing the established debt through various pieces of evidence. The petitioner&#039;s argument regarding the debt not being proved was deemed lacking merit, leading to the dismissal of the revision and cancellation of the bail bond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>