Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (9) TMI 1117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ainst the Respondent company/Corporate Debtor (for brevity Corporate Debtor) M/s. Compare Policy Insurance Web Aggregators Private Limited., under Section 9 of IBC 2016 for the alleged default on the part of the Corporate Debtor having an outstanding balance of Rs. 4,72,460/- on account of providing e-advertisement campaigning services to the corporate debtor. The details of transactions leading to the filing of this petition as averred by the applicant are as follows:- a. The Operational creditor is involved in the business of providing advertisement campaigning services in electronic media and the corporate debtor from time to time had placed orders for same services of the operational creditor. Copy of emails requesting....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Rs. 4,72,460/-. The applicant submits that the notice had been duly served on the corporate debtor on 23.12.2019 via speed post. The Copy of demand notice along with postal receipts and the tracking reports has been annexed. g. After receiving the reply from the corporate debtor of notice u/s. 8 of the code, the applicant filed application under Section 9 of the I & B code to initiate the CIRP. As per Form V, the total debt outstanding is Rs. 4,72,460/- against the invoices raised by the operational creditor between March, 2019 to September, 2019. 2. The Corporate Debtor in its reply to the application submits that: a. There is pre-existing dispute between the parties with respect to the poor services and unethical ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mail dated 15th March, 2019 and whatsapp messages dated 11th June, 2019, 12th June, 2019, 27th June, 2019, 3rd July, 2019, 5th August, 2019 and 10th August, 2019. 5. Heard the parties and perused the case records. 6. The case of respondent is that through whatsapp messages dispute was raised about quality of the services rendered by the operational creditor sent between 11.06.2019 to 10.08.2019. However, it is seen that the validation of the data generated after completion of services were sent every month before issuance of invoices by corporate debtor to applicant, which indicates that there was a consensus between the parties for raising invoices. The corporate debtor has not placed any document on record in order to show that any ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dispute in the information utility. It is clear that such notice must bring to the notice of operational creditor the "existence" of a dispute or the fact that a suit or arbitration proceeding relating to a dispute is pending between the parties. Therefore, all that the adjudicating authority is to see at this stage is whether there is a plausible contention which required further investigation and that the "dispute" is not a patently feeble legal argument or an assertion of fact unsupported by evidence. It is important to separate the grain from the chaff and to reject a spurious defence which is mere bluster." 9. Therefore, in the given facts and circumstances, it can be concluded that the applicant has established its claim which is d....