2021 (9) TMI 1117 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

Corporate debtor found in default for non-payment to operational creditor, leading to initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

The tribunal found the corporate debtor in default of payment to the operational creditor for e-advertisement services. Despite the debtor's claims of ... Maintainability of CIRP - initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor failed to make repayment of its dues - Operational Creditor - providing e-advertisement campaigning services to the corporate debtor - existence of debt and dispute or not - HELD THAT:- The validation of the data generated after completion of services were sent every month before issuance of invoices by corporate debtor to applicant, which indicates that there was a consensus between the parties for raising invoices. The corporate debtor has not placed any document on record in order to show that any invoice raised by applicant was ever disputed by it after issuance, in fact part payment was also made during April, 2019 to the applicant after receiving invoice. It is clearly established that the default in payment of the operational debt has occurred by the corporate debtor. Though the corporate debtor has raised dispute with regards the defective services, but has not placed on record any document which proves the invoices were disputed even after validation of the data. There is no merit in the so-called dispute raised by the corporate debtor as mere reply filed by the corporate debtor to the present application, is unable to establish any pre-existing dispute of genuine nature. Moreover, there are data for leads generated which was validated vide emails and only thereafter invoice was raised. Thus, it can be concluded that the applicant has established its claim which is due and payable by the corporate debtor - Application admitted - moratorium declared. Issues:1. Application filed by operational creditor seeking to initiate CIRP against corporate debtor for alleged default.2. Allegations of poor services and unethical approach by operational creditor as per corporate debtor's reply.3. Dispute regarding services and invoices raised by operational creditor.4. Adjudication of default in payment of operational debt by corporate debtor.5. Appointment of Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) and deposit of funds.6. Imposition of moratorium under Section 14 of IBC.Issue 1: Application to initiate CIRPThe operational creditor filed an application under Section 9 of IBC 2016 against the corporate debtor for an alleged default in payment of outstanding balance for e-advertisement services. The applicant detailed the transactions, including emails, validation of leads, and invoices raised but not fully paid by the corporate debtor.Issue 2: Allegations of poor servicesThe corporate debtor raised concerns about poor services and unethical approach by the operational creditor, citing deficiencies in services during a specific period. The corporate debtor claimed to have communicated disputes through emails and messages, requesting to pause the campaign due to service quality issues.Issue 3: Dispute over services and invoicesThe operational creditor denied the allegations of poor services, emphasizing the approval of successful leads through validation emails. The applicant argued that the corporate debtor's claims of deficiencies were unsubstantiated and aimed at creating disputes to avoid payment.Issue 4: Adjudication of defaultAfter reviewing the submissions and documents, the tribunal found that the default in payment by the corporate debtor was established. Despite the corporate debtor's claims of disputes, no evidence was presented to prove that invoices were disputed post-validation of data, leading to the dismissal of the alleged disputes as insubstantial.Issue 5: Appointment of IRP and funds depositThe tribunal appointed an Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) and directed the operational creditor to deposit funds with the IRP to cover expenses. The appointment was subject to the IRP's compliance with necessary regulations and no pending disciplinary proceedings against them.Issue 6: Imposition of moratoriumFollowing the admission of the application under Section 9(5) of IBC 2016, a moratorium was imposed on the corporate debtor as per Section 14(1), prohibiting certain actions. The terms of the moratorium were outlined, and compliance procedures were specified for communication of the order to relevant parties and authorities.This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the legal judgment, providing a detailed overview of the tribunal's decision and the reasoning behind it.