Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (9) TMI 236

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g to the grounds in AY 2013-14. 1. "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law. the ld. CIT'(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in cases of CIT Vs. Corrtcch Energy (P) Ltd. Vs. (2015) 372 ITR 97 (Gujarat) & Cheminvest Ltd. Vs. CIT (2015) 61 Taxmann.com 118 (Delhi), without appreciating the fact that as per CBDT Circular No, 5 of 2014. it was directed that disallowance u/s. I4A should he made even if the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the year." 2. "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law. the Ld. CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee without appreciating the fact that late payments of employee's co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oposition that disallowance cannot exceed the exempt income has been upheld. As an obvious corollary, when there is no exempt income there cannot be disallowance u/s 14A. Hence, we do not find any infirmity in the order of Ld.CIT(A). Accordingly, we uphold the order of Ld.CIT(A). 7. Apropos Ground No.2 On this issue AO made disallowances of a sum of Rs. 49,37,006/- being contribution made towards the Employees Provident Fund on the ground that it has paid beyond the due dates prescribed u/s. 24(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) of the Act. 8. On assessee's appeal, Ld.CIT(A) noted that the appellant submitted that during the previous year relevant to the assessment year under appeal, the Appellant had contributed Rs. 69,38,071/- towards Employees Provi....