<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 236 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411891</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed both revenue appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the appellant. Disallowance under Sec 14A was deemed unjustified as no exempt income was earned, following relevant court precedents. Regarding the disallowed EPF contribution made post due date, the CIT(A) ruled in favor of the appellant, as the payment was made before the return due date. The ITAT affirmed these decisions, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions and precedent, ultimately favoring the appellant in both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 236 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411891</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed both revenue appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the appellant. Disallowance under Sec 14A was deemed unjustified as no exempt income was earned, following relevant court precedents. Regarding the disallowed EPF contribution made post due date, the CIT(A) ruled in favor of the appellant, as the payment was made before the return due date. The ITAT affirmed these decisions, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions and precedent, ultimately favoring the appellant in both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>