TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (8) TMI 1178
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....itioner, contended that the order impugned is in violation of the provisions of the Sales Tax Act, more specifically, Section 3 and further, the order was passed without providing an opportunity to the writ petitioner. Thus, it is a case of violation of the principles of natural justice and the orders impugned lacks jurisdiction and thus, the writ petitions are to be considered. 5. It is contended that the petitioner was not given notice of the intention of the third respondent to treat the entire turnover of sale involving dealers outside Tamil Nadu as local sales. Section 52(3) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, stipulates that the appellant shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. 6. Perusal of the orders would reveal that no such opportunity in relation to the proposed assessment was provided to the petitioner's turnover under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, was ever given and the hearing was restricted to the levies confirmed under the Central Sales Tax Act by the fourth respondent. Thus, the orders impugned are unreasonable and in violation of the principles of natural justice. 7. Even the enhancement of turnover was made by the third respondent ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Appellate Authority. In other words, the principles of violation of natural justice or incompetency of an authority directly hitting the provisions of the Statute may be entertained by the High Court. However, if those violations and jurisdictional aspects are raised in connection with certain factual aspects, then such factual aspects required an elaborate adjudication, which need not be undertaken by the High Court in the absence of examination of original documents and evidences. 13. The importance of appellate remedy is to be considered. The appellate remedy contemplated under the Statutes at no circumstances be undermined. The Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal consists of Expert Presiding Officers, who all are well versed in Taxation Laws. Undoubtedly, they are competent to decide both the factual as well as the legal issues raised between the parties. Thus, the High Court need not burden itself in respect of the writ petitions filed without exhausting the appellate remedy provided under the Statutes. In such circumstances, the very purpose and object of such appellate remedy gets defeated. Therefore, the petitioner in this regard is bound to prefer an appeal before th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....horities under the provisions of the Statute and the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is limited to find out whether the processes contemplated under the Statutes and the procedural aspects are followed by the competent authorities as well as the appellate authorities or not. The High Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is not expected to usurp the powers of the appellate authorities by adjudicating the merits of the matter on certain documents and evidences. In the event of adjudication of merits under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the absence of complete trial with reference to the documents and evidences, there is a possibility of miscarriage of justice, and therefore, the High Court is expected to be cautious, while entering into the venture of adjudication of certain merits with reference to the original documents and evidences produced by the respective parties to the lis. This being the legislative intention, High Court is expected to trust the institutional authorities as well as the hierarchy of institutions contemplated under the Statutes. Institutional respects are of paramount importance for providing complete justic....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....egal principle settled in respect of the separation of powers under the Constitution of India. 1. Madras Bar Association vs. Union of India (UOI) (25.09.2014 - SC) : MANU/SC/0875/2014 If the historical background, the preamble, the entire scheme of the Constitution, relevant provisions thereof including Article 368 are kept in mind there can be no difficulty in discerning that the following can be regarded as the basic elements of the constitutional structure. (These cannot be catalogued but can only be illustrated): (1) The supremacy of the Constitution. (2) Republican and Democratic form of government and sovereignty of the country. (3) Secular and federal character of the Constitution. (4) Demarcation of power between the Legislature, the executive and the judiciary. (5) The dignity of the individual secured by the various freedoms and basic rights in Part III and the mandate to build a welfare State contained in Part IV. (6) The unity and the integrity of the Nation. 2. Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala and Anr. [MANU/SC/0445/1973 : (1973) 4 SCC 225]. That separation of powers between the legislature, the executive and the judici....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ut a consequence of principles of equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, breach of separation of judicial power may amount to negation of equality Under Article 14. Stated thus, a legislation can be invalidated on the basis of breach of the separation of powers since such breach is negation of equality Under Article 14 of the Constitution. (iv) The superior judiciary (High Courts and Supreme Court) is empowered by the Constitution to declare a law made by the legislature (Parliament and State legislatures) void if it is found to have transgressed the constitutional limitations or if it infringed the rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution. (v) The doctrine of separation of powers applies to the final judgments of the courts. Legislature cannot declare any decision of a court of law to be void or of no effect. It can, however, pass an amending Act to remedy the defects pointed out by a court of law or on coming to know of it aligned. In other words, a court's decision must always bind unless the conditions on which it is based are so fundamentally altered that the decision could not have been given in the altered circumstances. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sfactorily resolved; (b) the petition reveals all material facts; (c) the Petitioner has any alternative or effective remedy for the resolution of the dispute; (d) person invoking the jurisdiction is guilty of unexplained delay and laches; (e) ex facie barred by any laws of limitation; (f) grant of relief is against public policy or barred by any valid law; and host of other factors. 2. KanaiyalalLalchand Sachdev and Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. (07.02.2011 - SC) : MANU/SC/0103/2011 It is well settled that ordinarily relief Under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is not available if an efficacious alternative remedy is available to any aggrieved person. (See Sadhana Lodh v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.; Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai and SBI v. Allied Chemical Laboratories.) 3. Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. v. ChhabilDass Agarwal, MANU/SC/0802/2013 : 2014 (1) SCC 603, as follows: Para 15. while it can be said that this Court has recognised some exceptions to the Rule of alternative remedy i.e. where the statutory authority has not acted in accordance with the provisions of the enactment in question, or in defiance of the fundamental pr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he following terms Considering the plea regarding alternative remedy as raised by the appellant-State. Except for a period when Article 226 was amended by the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976, the power relating to alternative remedy has been considered to be a rule of self imposed limitation. It is essentially a rule of policy, convenience and discretion and never a rule of law. Despite the existence of an alternative remedy it is within the jurisdiction of discretion of the High Court to grant relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. At the same time, it cannot be lost sight of that though the matter relating to an alternative remedy has nothing to do with the jurisdiction of the case, normally the High Court should not interfere if there is an adequate efficacious alternative remedy. If somebody approaches the High Court without availing the alternative remedy provided the High Court should ensure that he has made out a strong case or that there exist good grounds to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction. 6. K.S. Rashid and Sons v. Income Tax Investigation Commission and Ors., AIR (1954) SC 207; Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Kotah and Ors., AIR (1955) SC 425;....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....approach the High Court by way of writ petition bypassing the appellate remedy, which is not desirable and cannot be accepted. As observed earlier, Institutional respect is of paramount importance. Even the point of jurisdiction, limitation, error apparent on the face of the record, are on merits and all are to be adjudicated before the appellate authority and the appellate authority, more specifically, the Appellate Tribunal or the Commissioner (Appeals), as the case may be, is empowered to adjudicate all such legal grounds raised by the respective parties and make a finding on merits. Thus, usurping the powers of the appellate authorities by the High Court by invoking its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is certainly unwarranted. The parties must be provided an opportunity to approach the appropriate authorities for redressal of their grievances in the manner known to law. In the event of entertaining all such writ petitions, the High Court will not only be over-burdened, but usurping the powers of the appellate authority is certainly not desirable. 16.Jurisdictional error should not result in exoneration of liability. Jurisdictional error, if any committed....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....al remedies and High Court is also entertaining such writ petitions in a routine manner. Keeping such writ petitions pending for long time would cause prejudice to the interest of the assessee also. Thus, such statutory provisions regarding the appeal are to be decided at the first instance, enabling the litigants to avail the remedy by following the procedures as contemplated under law. Such writ petitions are filed may be on the ground of jurisdiction or otherwise. However, the Courts are expected to ensure that all such legal grounds available to the parties are adjudicated before the proper Forum and only after exhausting the statutory remedies, writ petitions are to be entertained. In the absence of exhausting such remedies, High Court is loosing the benefit of deciding the matter on merits as the High Court cannot conduct a trial or examine the original records in the writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Thus, the Courts shall not provide an unnecessary opportunity to the assessee to escape from the liability merely on the ground on jurisdictional error, which is rectifiable." 15. The power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution ....