https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411600 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not a substitute for the statutory appellate mechanism where disputed facts, jurisdictional objections, and alleged procedural violations require examination of the original records. The proper forum for such issues is the appellate authority or Tribunal, and direct writ intervention is reserved for exceptional cases involving clear lack of authority or a plain breach of natural justice. Pendency of the writ petitions did not justify bypassing the prescribed remedy, and the petitioner was relegated to the jurisdictional Tribunal. en-us Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:23:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411600 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not a substitute for the statutory appellate mechanism where disputed facts, jurisdictional objections, and alleged procedural violations require examination of the original records. The proper forum for such issues is the appellate authority or Tribunal, and direct writ intervention is reserved for exceptional cases involving clear lack of authority or a plain breach of natural justice. Pendency of the writ petitions did not justify bypassing the prescribed remedy, and the petitioner was relegated to the jurisdictional Tribunal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411600