1986 (7) TMI 69

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 17,414 being rental income, should be excluded from the total income of Rs. 73,484.06 (which sum includes the rental income of Rs. 17,414) of the Trust for the purpose of calculating the permissible limit of accumulation of income under section 11(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?" The material facts giving rise to this reference, briefly, are as follows : The assessee is a trust and the assessment year in question is 1976-77. Under section 11(1) of the Act, the assessee claimed deduction on account of 25% accumulation, of a sum of Rs. 17,894. This contention was rejected by the Income-tax Officer. But on appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the contention of the assessee. On further appeal before the Tribunal by the D....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e reduced to the extent to which the sum has been directly utilised for the purpose of the earning of the income itself. At the same time, we agree with the representative of the assessee that the office and other miscellaneous expenses incurred by the assessee in connection with the running of the institution would qualify for allowance under section 11(2) in other words, the deduction presumably allowable under this sub-section would come to Rs. 14,015 (1/4 of Rs. 73,484-Rs. 17,414) instead of Rs. 17,894 claimed by the assessee." Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal, the assessee sought reference and it is at the instance of the assessee that the aforesaid question of law has been referred to this court for its opinion. Dur....