<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 69 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26346</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled that the rental income of Rs. 17,414 should not be excluded from the total income of the trust for determining the permissible accumulation limit under section 11(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that income derived from property held for charitable or religious purposes should be considered for accumulation purposes. Consequently, the Court&#039;s decision was against the Revenue, and each party was directed to bear their own costs in the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:11:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 69 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26346</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled that the rental income of Rs. 17,414 should not be excluded from the total income of the trust for determining the permissible accumulation limit under section 11(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that income derived from property held for charitable or religious purposes should be considered for accumulation purposes. Consequently, the Court&#039;s decision was against the Revenue, and each party was directed to bear their own costs in the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>