Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (8) TMI 148

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment Year 2015-2016. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the appellant's case, the ld.AO as well as the ld.C.I.T(A) has erred in law and has passed the penalty order u/s.271C of the Act imposing penalty on the appellant amounting to Rs. 22,23,512. The penalty passed by the ld.AO and confirmed by the ld.CIT(A), is bad in law and therefore deserves to be quashed. 2. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the appellant's case, the Ld.CIT(A), has erred in confirming the penalty levied by the ld.AO amounting to Rs. 22,23,512/- When no such penalty is leviable on the appellant, the penalty imposed by the ld.AO shall be deleted. 3. The appellant craves leave to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fault in deducting the TDS under the provisions of chapter XVIIB of the Act. The assessee has deducted the TDS but failed to deposit the same within the due date to the account of Government exchequer on account of some financial difficulty. As there was no default as far as deduction of TDS is concerned, therefore the penalty cannot be attracted under the provisions of section 271C of the Act. 4.3 However, the AO disregarded the contention of the assessee by observing that the assessee is exigible to the penalty under section 271C of the Act even it fails to deposit the amount of TDS to the account of Government exchequer within the due date after deducting the same from the expenses subjected to TDS under chapter XVIIB of the Act. The AO....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....terials available on record. The provisions of clause 'a' specified under section 271C of the Act has a direct bearing on the issue on hand which reads as under: Penalty for failure to deduct tax at source. 10 271C. 11[(1) If any person fails to- (a) deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B; or XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX then, such person shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of tax which such person failed to deduct or pay as aforesaid.] 9.1 A plain reading of the provisions as discussed above clearly reveals that the penalty can be attracted under section 271C of the Act only in a situatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o the conclusion that the assessee has deducted the TDS on the expenses as discussed above but failed to deposit the same in the account of Government exchequer account within the specified time. Thus in such a situation, the penalty under section 271C of the Act is not attracted. 9.4 We also note that the judgments relied by the authorities below in reaching to the conclusion that the assessee is subject to the penalty under the provisions of section 271C of the Act have been reversed by the subsequent judgment of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court of Full Bench in the case of Lakshadweep development Corporation Ltd (supra). The relevant extract of the judgment is reproduced as under: "43. In the light of the above discussion, the Reference ....