<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 148 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410570</link>
    <description>Section 271C penalises failure to deduct tax at source under Chapter XVII-B and does not extend to a mere delay in remitting tax already deducted. On the facts, the assessee had deducted tax under section 194A but deposited it late, so the default was one of non-payment after deduction rather than non-deduction. Following the Full Bench view that non-remittance is outside section 271C(1)(a), the penalty was held not leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:43:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 148 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410570</link>
      <description>Section 271C penalises failure to deduct tax at source under Chapter XVII-B and does not extend to a mere delay in remitting tax already deducted. On the facts, the assessee had deducted tax under section 194A but deposited it late, so the default was one of non-payment after deduction rather than non-deduction. Following the Full Bench view that non-remittance is outside section 271C(1)(a), the penalty was held not leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>