2013 (11) TMI 1780

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iel. ORDER Per D. Manmohan, V.P. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) - 40, Mumbai and it pertains to A.Y. 2004-05. 2. Though the assessee company raised five grounds, in the grounds of appeal annexed to Form No. 36, at the time of hearing the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that grounds No. 1, 2 & 3 are not presses and ground No. 5 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Harshad Mehta, same issue was decided against the assessee. Following the findings in the order passed in the case of Shri Hitesh Mehta for A.Y. 2005-06 the claim of interest expenditure was not accepted by the learned CIT(A). Further aggrieved, assessee is in appeal before us. 4. At the time of hearing the learned counsel placed before us copy of the order passed by ITAT in the case of S....