1984 (8) TMI 363
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....R. Karanjawala, Adv. JUDGMENT O. Chinnappa Reddy, J. 1. On an allegation that the petitioners had acted in breach of an undertaking given by them in Suit No. 2308 of 1983 in the High Court of Bombay, a notice was issued to them to show cause why they should not be committed for contempt of court. Cause was sought to be shown. A learned Single Judge of the High Court recorded the following....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... The appeal was dismissed by the Division Bench and the present Special Leave Petition has been filed against the judgment of the Division Bench. Shri Ramesh N. Keswani, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the Petition for Special Leave to Appeal has been filed under Article 136 of the Constitution, the petitioners have, in law, an appeal as of right Under Section 19(1) of the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t, there is one statutory right of appeal to a Division Bench of not less than two Judges of the Court. If the order of committal for contempt of court is made by a Bench, an appeal lies as of right to the Supreme Court. Where an appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge to a Division Bench, the statutory right of appeal gets exhausted and there is no further right of appeal to....
TaxTMI