https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294807 A special leave petition under Article 136 was held not to provide a further appeal as of right after the statutory appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act had already been taken to and decided by a Division Bench, so the objection to maintainability failed. The Court also treated the undertaking as clearly breached, upheld the contempt finding and punishment, and accepted the Single Judge's authority to issue consequential directions to remedy and close the breach. The challenge to the contempt order therefore failed in its entirety. en-us Wed, 22 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Dec 2022 17:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294807 A special leave petition under Article 136 was held not to provide a further appeal as of right after the statutory appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act had already been taken to and decided by a Division Bench, so the objection to maintainability failed. The Court also treated the undertaking as clearly breached, upheld the contempt finding and punishment, and accepted the Single Judge's authority to issue consequential directions to remedy and close the breach. The challenge to the contempt order therefore failed in its entirety. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294807