2021 (1) TMI 861

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Justice A. M. Badar For the Petitioner : Adv. Sri. George Johnson For the Respondents : SC,CBEC- Sri. Sreelal N. Warriar JUDGMENT By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 22/09/2020 at Ext.P1 to the petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at sufficient length of time. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that after introduction ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the matter of Murli Realtors Pvt. Ltd vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune reported in 2015 (37) S.T.R. 618. 6. It is urged that the security deposit is received towards recovery of damages if any caused to the lease property by the assessee and it is not towards any provision of taxable service. Paragraph 6.1 of the said judgment was pressed into service to demonstrate that there is no ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the impugned order is an appealable order and statutory appeal under Section 86(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 lies before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore. 10. In the wake of availability of alternate remedy, this Court can entertain the writ petition in a very limited arena. For entertaining writ petition in the wake of alternate remedy, the petitioner has t....