<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 861 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403269</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order assigning adjudication, stating that despite jurisdictional contentions and cited judgments, the order did not violate fundamental principles of judicial procedure or justice. The court emphasized the availability of an alternate remedy through a statutory appeal under Section 86(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, and concluded that the writ petition was unnecessary, disposing of it with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 861 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403269</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order assigning adjudication, stating that despite jurisdictional contentions and cited judgments, the order did not violate fundamental principles of judicial procedure or justice. The court emphasized the availability of an alternate remedy through a statutory appeal under Section 86(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, and concluded that the writ petition was unnecessary, disposing of it with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>