Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (12) TMI 738

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ADHE AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,)   RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.) JUDGMENT ALOK ARADHE J. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2009-10. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the revenue submitted that assessee has imported software and paid Rs. 4.05 Crores without deducting tax at source under Section 195 of the Act. It is further submitted that assessee has capitalized the imported software and claimed depreciation. The Assessing Officer disallowed the depreciation invoking Section 40(a)(i) of the Act. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the tribu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e even for denying depreciation under Section 32 of the Act. In support of aforesaid submissions, reliance has been placed on decisions in MYSORE MINERALS LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (1999) 106 TAXMAN 166 (SC) and 'SHRI. CHAUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANY VS ITO', (2020) 81 TAXMANN.COM 47 (SC). 3. Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that depreciation is not an outgoing expendit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in favour of the assessee.   In support of aforesaid submission reliance has been placed on decisions in 'COMMISSION OF INCOME-TAX VS. MARK AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD.', (2013) 40 TAXMANN.COM 482 and 'NECTAR BEVERAGES (P.) LTD. VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX', (2009) 182 TAXMAN 319. 4. We have considered the rival submissions made on both the sides and have perused the ....