<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 738 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401939</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, as the Tribunal did not adequately address the arguments presented by both parties. The Court emphasized the importance of a thorough review of the case before reaching a decision and did not address the substantive legal question raised in the appeal regarding the disallowance of depreciation on imported software under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 738 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401939</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, as the Tribunal did not adequately address the arguments presented by both parties. The Court emphasized the importance of a thorough review of the case before reaching a decision and did not address the substantive legal question raised in the appeal regarding the disallowance of depreciation on imported software under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>