1909 (8) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d no interest in the paramba purchased. Exhibit K is most untrustworthy as a statement of title because it was made in a suit in which it was the object of the present 2nd defendant to defeat the claims of a mortgagee from her mother and to do this she alleged, if indeed she did allege, that her mother had no interest. The document is not entirely clear. We are not sure that the 2nd defendant did ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by name. 4. It is very doubtful whether this is really consistent with the allegations in Exhibit K : but if it is, it seems to be much more likely to be what the petitioner believed to be true- because it does admit some interest in Chiratha, while the object of the proceedings was to prevent the sale of the property as Chiratha's assets. 5. From Exhibit XV it appears that the contes....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n. The donees therefore took it with the incidents of Tarwad property Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee (1892) I.L.R. 16 M. 201 that is to say, as we understand it, not merely that the property was impartibly but that the donees, though not forming a Tarwad with a Kamavan of its own Kortoh Amman Kutti v. Perungottil Appu Nambiar (1906) I.L.R. 29 M. 324, had the same interests ....