<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1909 (8) TMI 2 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292071</link>
    <description>Property gifted to a mother and her children with the incidents of Tarwad property was treated as family property, so each child acquired an interest by birth. The defendants were therefore not absolute owners and had no power to convey the property as if it belonged solely to them. On that basis, specific performance of the agreement of sale could not be enforced against them, and the plaintiff&#039;s suit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 1909 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1909 (8) TMI 2 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292071</link>
      <description>Property gifted to a mother and her children with the incidents of Tarwad property was treated as family property, so each child acquired an interest by birth. The defendants were therefore not absolute owners and had no power to convey the property as if it belonged solely to them. On that basis, specific performance of the agreement of sale could not be enforced against them, and the plaintiff&#039;s suit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 1909 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>