Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (10) TMI 915

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the newly inserted Section 10A of the 'I&B Code' as a sequel to the promulgation of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 published in the Gazette of India on 5th June, 2020 declined to admit the application holding that there was a bar created by law in terms of the newly inserted Section 10A coming into force. Aggrieved thereof and thereunder the Operational Creditor has preferred the instant appeal. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the limited question of interpretation/ applicability of Section 10A of the 'I&B Code'. The sole question for consideration is whether the amending provision of Section 10A introduced in 'I&B Code' providing for suspension of initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) at the instance of a Financial Creditor, an Operational Creditor or a Corporate Person would be applicable, for any default arising on or after 25th March, 2020 for the specified period of six months or any extended period not exceeding one year as may be notified to applications filed post 25th March, 2020 and if so what would happen to an application filed by a Financial Creditor, an Operational Creditor or a Corporate Person who ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Section 10A. It is further submitted that the Adjudicating Authority failed to appreciate the difference between 'initiation' and 'admission' which landed it in error resulting in misinterpretation of Section 10A. It is further submitted that Section 10A prohibits filing of application on or after 5th June, 2020 for defaults occurring during the relevant period specified in the Ordinance and not "initiation" of CIRP after the said date. Once an application has been filed, Section 10A does not stand as an impediment in its admission or non-admission on the basis of merit. It is lastly submitted that Section 10A cannot be construed to include applications that had already been filed and were pending before the Adjudicating Authority. It is further submitted that the intention is further clarified by the expression 'shall ever be filed' which refers to applications that are intended to be filed on or after 5th June, 2020 for defaults occurring during the relevant period specified in the Ordinance. 4. Per contra, it is submitted on behalf of the Respondent that initiation of insolvency proceedings against businesses, when the economy and markets have been critically impacted on ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oduced through Ordinance No.9 of 2020 dated 05th June, 2020 which has been reproduced hereinabove. 7. The precise issue for consideration is whether an application for initiation of CIRP of a Corporate Debtor in respect of default committed before 25th March, 2020 but filed before 05th June, 2020 i.e. the date on which amending ordinance came into force, in respect of such default, would be maintainable in view of the express bar created by the main provision of Section 10A. 8. It is by now well settled that a substantive administrative right cannot be taken away except by clear indication of intention to that effect by an express statutory provision or by necessary implication. No statute, unless it deals with procedure only, can be construed to have retrospective operation unless there is an express provision to that effect or same can be inferred by necessary implication. Dealing with interpretation of statutes and the concept of purposive interpretation qua a welfare legislation in "Bharat Singh v. Management of New Delhi Tuberculosis Centre, New Delhi and Ors.- (1986) 2 SCC 614", the Hon'ble Apex Court observed as under: "11. In interpretation of statutes, Court....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cation for initiation of CIRP of a Corporate Debtor for any default arising on or after 25th March, 2020 for a period of six months or such further period as may be notified but not exceeding one year from such date. This provision is clearly prohibitory in nature and filing of applications under Sections 7, 9 & 10 in respect of default arising on or after 25th March, 2020 is clearly barred for the specified period of six months or the extended period not exceeding one year, if so notified. Proviso to this main provision creates a further bar qua a default that may occur during the specified period. This construction is placed on the proviso adopting purposive interpretation to advance the intended object of the Ordinance viz. to prevent corporate persons experiencing distress due to impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Any other interpretation would lead to absurdity and defeat the object of the amending Ordinance. The explanation clarifies that Section 10A cannot be interpreted to apply the embargo in terms of main provision to any default committed before 25th March, 2020. 10. It is significant to notice that the embargo on filing of applications under Sections 7, 9 & 10 for initiati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g Authority. Same appears to be the position recognised in definition of 'Insolvency Commencement Date' as defined under Section 5(12) which provides as under: "5. Definition.-........... (12)"insolvency commencement date" means the date of admission of an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process by the Adjudicating Authority under sections 7, 9 or section 10, as the case may be" 12. However, 'initiation date' in respect of CIRP in regard to Corporate Debtor is different from the 'Insolvency Commencement Date'. Section 5(11) defines 'initiation date' as under: "5. Definition.- ...........(11) "initiation date" means the date on which a financial creditor, corporate applicant or operational creditor, as the case may be, makes an application to the Adjudicating Authority for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process;" 13. It is manifestly clear that 'initiation date' for CIRP is the date on which the Financial Creditor, Operational Creditor or Corporate Applicant (for short "eligible applicant") makes an application to the Adjudicating Authority for initiating such process. Thus, it is crystal clear that "initiation date" is ....