Tribunal upholds rejection of application under Section 9 of I&B Code due to default post cut-off date.

The tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the application under Section 9 of the I&B Code, as the default occurred after the cut-off date of 25th March 2020, and the bar under Section 10A was applicable. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Interpretation and applicability of Section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code).
2. Distinction between "initiation" and "commencement" of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
3. Impact of Section 10A on applications filed before its promulgation.
4. Legislative intent behind the suspension of CIRP due to COVID-19.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Interpretation and Applicability of Section 10A of the I&B Code:
The core issue is whether Section 10A, which suspends the initiation of CIRP for defaults arising on or after 25th March 2020, applies to applications filed before its promulgation on 5th June 2020. Section 10A states: "no application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process of a corporate debtor shall be filed, for any default arising on or after 25th March, 2020 for a period of six months or such further period, not exceeding one year from such date, as may be notified in this behalf." The tribunal emphasized that the provision is prohibitory in nature, barring the filing of applications for defaults arising on or after 25th March 2020 for the specified period.

2. Distinction between "Initiation" and "Commencement" of CIRP:
The appellant argued that Section 10A deals with "initiation" and not "commencement" of CIRP, drawing a distinction between the two. "Initiation date" is defined under Section 5(11) of the I&B Code as the date on which an application is made to the Adjudicating Authority, while "Insolvency Commencement Date" under Section 5(12) refers to the date of admission of the application. The tribunal clarified that "initiation" refers to the filing of the application by the creditor, whereas "commencement" refers to the admission of the application by the Adjudicating Authority.

3. Impact of Section 10A on Applications Filed Before Its Promulgation:
The tribunal examined whether applications filed before 5th June 2020 for defaults occurring after 25th March 2020 are maintainable. It concluded that the bar on filing applications under Section 10A is retrospective, applying to defaults arising on or after 25th March 2020, regardless of the filing date. The tribunal held that the legislative intent was to prevent the initiation of CIRP for defaults during the specified period due to the economic impact of COVID-19.

4. Legislative Intent Behind the Suspension of CIRP Due to COVID-19:
The respondent argued that initiating insolvency proceedings during the economic downturn caused by COVID-19 would be counterproductive and detrimental to economic revival. The tribunal agreed, noting that the legislative intent was to provide relief to businesses affected by the pandemic. The tribunal adopted a purposive interpretation of Section 10A, emphasizing that the provision aims to prevent corporate distress and support economic recovery.

Conclusion:
The tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the application under Section 9 of the I&B Code, as the default occurred after the cut-off date of 25th March 2020, and the bar under Section 10A was applicable. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.

---