Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1934 (9) TMI 3

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tax made under Section 66 (2) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, raising the questions (1) whether in the circumstances of the case and in view of the provisions of Sections 4(J) and 10 of the Act, the assessees have been correctly assessed on the total amount of Rs, 97,882 received by them as profits and gains of the business carried on by them as managing agents of a certain company, and (2) wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in respect of the part of their income so paid away to third parties. It has not been argued that the sums paid to third parties come within any of the various deductions allowed by the Indian Income Tax Act. But the argument has been that the sums paid to third parties; never were the income, profits or gains of the assessees within the meaning of Section 4 of the Act. The Income Tax Commissione....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to be paid away was a proportion of the net profits, whereas here it is a proportion of the income. But whether the obligation to pay is based on the gross income or on the net profits, cannot in my view affect the question. I think, therefore, that the case is really covered by that decision. But Mr. Coltman, in support of his contention that the sum paid to third parties is not part of the inco....