<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1934 (9) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290311</link>
    <description>Managing agents&#039; entire business receipts remained taxable where an agreement merely required payment of part of those receipts to third parties and created no charge on the income source. The contractual obligation constituted an application of income after receipt, not diversion of income at source; therefore, the full amount formed part of taxable income under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Payments to third parties were not deductible because no specific statutory deduction applied and the payments arose only from the contractual covenant. The Revenue&#039;s position prevailed, with the whole receipt assessed and no deduction allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 11:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1934 (9) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290311</link>
      <description>Managing agents&#039; entire business receipts remained taxable where an agreement merely required payment of part of those receipts to third parties and created no charge on the income source. The contractual obligation constituted an application of income after receipt, not diversion of income at source; therefore, the full amount formed part of taxable income under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Payments to third parties were not deductible because no specific statutory deduction applied and the payments arose only from the contractual covenant. The Revenue&#039;s position prevailed, with the whole receipt assessed and no deduction allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>