1993 (4) TMI 330
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nal case was registered against the respondent for offences punishable inter alia under Section 5(2)(i)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In addition thereto, a disciplinary proceeding was initiated against the respondent and a charge-sheet dated February 7, 1990 was issued. The respondent was also placed under suspension by order dated May 10, 1990. The respondent challenged the suspension ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....es, which are yet to be investigated in the departmental proceedings, did not arise for consideration or adjudication by the Tribunal at this stage. This being so, the Tribunal's order quashing the charge-sheet as well, on reaching the conclusion that the suspension order had to be set aside, is unwarranted. The respondent had been under suspension for nearly two years on the date of the Tribu....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI