2020 (5) TMI 146

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: NONE   JUDGMENT S.SUJATHA J. , This appeal is filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'Act') relating to the Assessment Year 2010-11 raising the following substantial questions of law: (1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Tribunal is right in dismissing the appeal of the Revenue by holding that imposition of penalty....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....edit for set-off of loss carried forward. The Assessing authority during the assessment proceedings has noticed that the assessee claimed depreciation of Rs. 10,23,53,309/- as against admissible depreciation of Rs. 1,44,74,986/-. Thus, the Assessing Authority disallowed a sum of Rs. 30,86,504/- and Rs. 4,86,946/- being payment made to harvesters/transporters and vehicle hire charges and legal fees....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rther appeal filed by the Revenue before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, the assessee had also filed cross-objection challenging the notice issued by the Revenue under Section 274 of the Act as defective. The ITAT placing reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT(A) Vs. Manjunatha Cotton and Ginning Factory reported in (2013) 359 ITR 565 held that imposing of penalty under Secti....