<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 146 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395113</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty imposed on the assessee due to the lack of specificity in the show cause notice issued under Section 274 of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of clearly stating the charge in the notice to ensure the validity of penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 06:53:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 146 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395113</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty imposed on the assessee due to the lack of specificity in the show cause notice issued under Section 274 of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of clearly stating the charge in the notice to ensure the validity of penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>