Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (4) TMI 547

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....milar question of law. 1.1 Under the circumstances, ADMIT. The following substantial question of law arises for consideration: (A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in upholding the deletion of addition of CENVAT receivable on Rs. 2,98,57,398/- made under section 145A of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2. Insofar as the proposed question [B] is concerned, the same relates to deletion of disallowance of Rs. 69,22,190/- made under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as "the rules"). 2.1 The Assessing Officer disallowed expenses of Rs. 69,22,190....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, which was 8.50% of such income, it is not possible to state that there is any infirmity in the impugned order passed by the Tribunal upholding the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) qua this ground of appeal. Proposed question [B], therefore, does not give rise to any question of law. 3. Insofar as proposed question [C] is concerned, a perusal of the controversy raised vide the said question shows that it is only consequential to the ground of appeal raised vide proposed question [B]. Having regard to the fact that question [B] does not give rise to any question of law; as a necessary corollary it follows that question [C] also does not give rise to any question of law. 4. Insofar as the proposed question [D] is concerned, the sam....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urt in the case of CIT v. Vijaya Bank (supra) would be applicable to the facts of the present case, and directed the Assessing Officer to verify the entries in the profit and loss account and the balance sheet to ascertain that the assessee has correspondingly/simultaneously obliterated the said provision from its accounts by reducing the corresponding amount from loans and advances/ debtors on the assets side of the balance sheet, and consequently, at the end of the year, the figure in the loans and advances or the debtors on the assets side of the balance sheet is shown as net of the provision for the "impugned bad debt". She, accordingly, held that the assessee will be entitled to the benefit of deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the ....