https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394640 The HC admitted the appeal regarding the addition of CENVAT receivable under section 145A, questioning the ITAT's decision to uphold its deletion. For the disallowance under section 14A, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A)'s directive to delete additional disallowance. Concerning doubtful debts under section 36(1)(vii), the ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) to allow the appeal, following a SC decision, and directed verification of financial entries. The court's analysis upheld the ITAT's decisions, with no substantial question of law arising from these issues. en-us Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394640 The HC admitted the appeal regarding the addition of CENVAT receivable under section 145A, questioning the ITAT's decision to uphold its deletion. For the disallowance under section 14A, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A)'s directive to delete additional disallowance. Concerning doubtful debts under section 36(1)(vii), the ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) to allow the appeal, following a SC decision, and directed verification of financial entries. The court's analysis upheld the ITAT's decisions, with no substantial question of law arising from these issues. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394640